Original research

The U.S. Detox Access Gap

Four in five addiction treatment facilities listed in SAMHSA’s national treatment locator do not report offering detoxification services. Across the 4,041 treatment communities we could measure, the median straight-line distance to a listed detox provider is 7.9 miles. But access is highly uneven: in 341 of those towns and cities, the nearest listed detox provider is more than fifty straight-line miles away.

An analysis of all 11,513 facilities in SAMHSA’s national treatment locator, measured against the 2,169 of 2,261 listed detox providers in that dataset that carry usable coordinates.

Research & analysis by Treatment Locators · Published September 2, 2026 · SAMHSA data retrieved August 16, 2026 · Analysis output generated 2026-09-02 · Methodology & citation

19.6%

Of SAMHSA-listed facilities report offering detox

2,261 of 11,513

7.9 mi

Median straight-line miles to a listed detox provider

Across the 4,041 measured treatment cities

996

Treatment cities over 25 straight-line miles from detox

24.6% of cities measured

341

Treatment cities over 50 straight-line miles from detox

8.4% of cities measured

Headshot of Cole TimonereMedically reviewed by Cole Timonere, PhD, JD, LMHC, LPCC

Key findings

Detoxification is the least commonly reported service in American addiction treatment

For patients who require supervised withdrawal management, it can be an important first step before ongoing treatment. These are the four findings that hold up across every cut of the data.

19.6% of facilities

Only one listed facility in five reports a detoxification service

2,261 of 11,513 SAMHSA-listed facilities report offering detoxification. The remaining 9,252 facilities do not report a detoxification service in the SAMHSA data; they may report counseling, outpatient, medication, residential, or other treatment services. The dataset does not distinguish levels of withdrawal management, so the 2,261 may include ambulatory as well as inpatient detoxification.

A rural-urban split

The national median is 7.9 miles — and that hides the problem

Half of the 4,041 measured treatment cities sit within 7.9 straight-line miles of a listed detox provider. The gap is concentrated: 996 are beyond 25 miles and 341 are beyond 50. On this measure the pattern is one of uneven distribution rather than a uniform national shortage.

205.5 miles

Alaska has the worst median distance in the country

In Alaska, the median treatment community is 205.5 straight-line miles from the nearest listed detox provider, against a national median of 7.9. Among states with at least 15 measured cities, Alaska has the highest share of remote communities: 72% of its measured treatment cities have no listed detox provider within 50 straight-line miles.

792.7 miles

The most isolated treatment community in the United States

Unalaska, AK has a SAMHSA-listed treatment facility and no listed detox provider within 792.7 straight-line miles. Straight-line distance across water understates the journey: there is no road route. Every one of the ten most isolated treatment communities in this dataset is in Alaska, where many of these routes are not drivable at all.

Interactive · 52 territories

Detox access, state by state

Share of SAMHSA-listed facilities that report offering detox

Map of the United States shaded by share of samhsa-listed facilities that report offering detox. Select a state to open its treatment directory.VTNHMARICTNJDEMDDC

Sharpest gaps · Detox share

  1. 1Alaska7.8%
  2. 2Iowa7.9%
  3. 3Montana8.2%
  4. 4Hawaii8.6%
  5. 5Minnesota8.8%

Hover or tab any state to read its full profile. Northeastern states too small to shade are boxed beside the map.

Detox share

Higher shareLower share

The distribution

The two ends of the country, measured four ways

The same 52 states and territories, ranked by four measures: what share of a state's SAMHSA-listed facilities report offering detox, and how far its treatment communities sit from the nearest listed detox provider in a straight line.

Lowest share of facilities reporting detox

Percent of the state's SAMHSA-listed treatment facilities that report offering detoxification.

  1. 1Alaska7.8%5/64
  2. 2Iowa7.9%15/189
  3. 3Montana8.2%6/73
  4. 4Hawaii8.6%7/81
  5. 5Minnesota8.8%28/319
  6. 6Oregon9%16/178
  7. 7Washington9.8%25/254
  8. 8Idaho10.5%11/105
  9. 9District of Columbia11.1%3/27
  10. 10Maine11.3%13/115

Highest share of facilities reporting detox

The same measure, at the other end of the distribution.

  1. 1California36.2%310/856
  2. 2Rhode Island30.8%12/39
  3. 3Louisiana30.6%49/160
  4. 4Florida30.4%143/471
  5. 5West Virginia28.8%34/118
  6. 6Texas28.3%113/399
  7. 7Ohio28%129/460
  8. 8Nevada27%20/74
  9. 9New Mexico26.2%28/107
  10. 10Georgia25.6%61/238

Farthest from care: median straight-line miles to a listed detox provider

States with at least 15 measured treatment cities. National median is 7.9 miles.

  1. 1Alaska205.5 mimedian
  2. 2Montana75.6 mimedian
  3. 3Wyoming52 mimedian
  4. 4Arkansas31.4 mimedian
  5. 5North Dakota30.6 mimedian
  6. 6Kansas30.1 mimedian
  7. 7Nebraska28.3 mimedian
  8. 8Iowa28.2 mimedian
  9. 9New Mexico28 mimedian
  10. 10South Dakota27.9 mimedian

Share of treatment cities more than 50 straight-line miles from detox

Measured cities only; states with at least 15 measured treatment cities.

  1. 1Alaska72%18/25
  2. 2Montana64.5%20/31
  3. 3Wyoming55.2%16/29
  4. 4North Dakota37.5%6/16
  5. 5Oregon36.8%21/57
  6. 6Hawaii34.8%8/23
  7. 7Kansas32.4%22/68
  8. 8New Mexico29.5%13/44
  9. 9South Dakota26.7%4/15
  10. 10Colorado25.7%18/70

The far end

The most isolated treatment community in every state

The national ranking is dominated by Alaska, so this view shows the single worst-served measured treatment community in each state and territory. Each has a SAMHSA-listed treatment facility but no listed detox provider within the straight-line distance shown; real travel distance is generally longer.

  1. 01Unalaska, Alaska792.7mi
  2. 02Madawaska, Maine176.7mi
  3. 04Elko, Nevada154mi
  4. 05Glasgow, Montana141.7mi
  5. 08Grangeville, Idaho126.3mi
  6. 09Waimea, Hawaii121.6mi
  7. 10Kanab, Utah121.6mi
  8. 11Laredo, Texas120mi
  9. 13Page, Arizona118.6mi
  10. 14Yuma, Colorado114mi
  11. 16Goodland, Kansas102.2mi
  12. 22Hobart, Oklahoma84.4mi
  13. 23Clarksville, Iowa78.5mi
  14. 28Augusta, Arkansas64.3mi
  15. 29Galena, Illinois61.7mi
  16. 33Newport, Vermont52.6mi
  17. 37Blakely, Georgia47.8mi
  18. 42Marianna, Florida43.6mi
  19. 45Athens, Ohio35.1mi
  20. 46Oakland, Maryland32.3mi
  21. 49Seaford, Delaware19.3mi

Data analysis · supply against burden

Listed detox providers compared with recent overdose mortality

This comparison does not measure whether a state has sufficient detox capacity, which would require bed counts and admissions data this analysis does not contain. It provides a standardised way to compare listed detox-provider supply with the scale of recent overdose mortality, using CDC provisional counts for the most recent rolling 12-month period.

Listed detox providers against overdose burden

Each dot is a state. The diagonal marks the overall ratio for the states shown, 3.3 listed detox providers per 100 overdose deaths. States below the line have fewer listed detox providers per 100 overdose deaths than the U.S. overall; this describes relative supply, not whether capacity is sufficient. Both axes are logarithmic.

Scatter plot of facilities reporting detox against 12-month provisional overdose deaths for each state515501501003001,0003,00010,000Overdose deaths, 12 months (CDC provisional)Facilities reporting detoxification services
Below national ratio At or above

Hover or focus a state for detail.

Section refCLINICAL.03Clinical context

Clinical context: why the detox bottleneck is a safety problem, not just a convenience one

Live CDC feed12 months ending April 2026

Detoxification is the medical management of withdrawal. Withdrawal from alcohol and benzodiazepines can be medically dangerous, and some patients require supervised withdrawal management. Alcohol withdrawal can progress to seizures and to delirium tremens, a condition with meaningful mortality when it is not treated in a clinical setting.

Benzodiazepine withdrawal can also cause seizures and other serious complications, particularly after abrupt discontinuation in physically dependent patients.

Opioid withdrawal is rarely fatal in itself, but it carries a distinct danger: tolerance falls sharply during abstinence, so a return to a previously ordinary dose after an unsupervised withdrawal attempt is a common overdose scenario. Medications such as buprenorphine and methadone can reduce opioid withdrawal symptoms and cravings and, when continued as part of treatment, are associated with reduced overdose risk.

What the live figures mean here

66,937 overdose deaths in the 12 months ending April 2026 sit on top of a network in which 2,810 of 4,111 treatment cities contain no SAMHSA-listed facility reporting detoxification services.

This is why distance is worth measuring. Long travel distances may contribute to delayed treatment, greater reliance on emergency departments, or attempts to manage withdrawal without nearby specialty services.

Source: CDC VSRR provisional counts · updated April 2026

Withdrawal timeline visualizer

A visual summary of the timings and symptoms described in the written sections below. Select a phase to see the detail for that stage.

Alcohol · Peak

24–72 hours

Tremor, sweating, anxiety, nausea, insomnia, elevated heart rate

High. Alcohol withdrawal involves a rebound of excitatory nervous system activity after prolonged suppression of the brain's calming (GABA) signaling, which is why seizures and delirium tremens are documented complications rather than rare edge cases. Alcohol withdrawal is generally managed under medical supervision for heavy or long-term drinkers, and a history of prior severe withdrawal is specifically associated with a higher risk of another severe episode.

Onset Peak Duration Higher medical risk windowTime axis is compressed for legibility.

Clinical sources

The clinical statements in this section summarise published federal guidance. They are not findings of this analysis, and Treatment Locators did not conduct clinical research.

  1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. TIP 45: Detoxification and Substance Abuse Treatment.
  2. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Alcohol Use Disorder: A Comparison Between DSM-IV and DSM-5.
  3. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder.
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Provisional Drug Overdose Death Counts.

Cole Timonere

Headshot of Cole Timonere

Medically reviewed by Cole Timonere, PhD, JD, LMHC, LPCC

Licensed mental health and clinical counselor with doctoral and legal training, specializing in substance use disorders, withdrawal management, and behavioral health care. Reviews the clinical accuracy of the treatment guides on this site.

Editorial content — always confirm clinical details with a licensed provider.

The full dataset

Reported detoxification service availability in every state and territory

Sort by any column. Each state name links through to its full facility directory.

States & territories
52
Facilities analysed
11,513
Reporting detoxification
2,261

Full dataset

Every state and territory, 52 rows

Reported detoxification service availability by U.S. state and territory
#
1AlaskaAK6457.8%205.5 mi1872%
2IowaIA189157.9%28.2 mi1719.1%
3MontanaMT7368.2%75.6 mi2064.5%
4HawaiiHI8178.6%12.3 mi834.8%
5MinnesotaMN319288.8%16.7 mi1212.9%
6OregonOR178169%19.7 mi2136.8%
7WashingtonWA254259.8%8.7 mi1921.8%
8IdahoID1051110.5%20.7 mi619.4%
9District of ColumbiaDC27311.1%0 mi00%
10MaineME1151311.3%14.3 mi614.3%
11South DakotaSD39512.8%27.9 mi426.7%
12WisconsinWI2052713.2%25.4 mi1112.5%
13DelawareDE37513.5%6.4 mi00%
14MissouriMO2453313.5%24.5 mi54.7%
15ConnecticutCT1532113.7%4.6 mi00%
16ArkansasAR1091513.8%31.4 mi815.7%
17ColoradoCO2323213.8%17.6 mi1825.7%
18NebraskaNE1081513.9%28.3 mi617.6%
19KansasKS1351914.1%30.1 mi2232.4%
20New JerseyNJ3194514.1%3.7 mi00%
21OklahomaOK1281814.1%26.5 mi1420.6%
22IllinoisIL5157614.8%5.5 mi63.3%
23KentuckyKY3755614.9%15.5 mi21.6%
24MassachusettsMA3124715.1%3.3 mi00%
25North DakotaND59915.3%30.6 mi637.5%
26TennesseeTN3024916.2%20.9 mi21.9%
27North CarolinaNC4147016.9%9.8 mi43.1%
28New YorkNY59510217.1%6.9 mi116.3%
29AlabamaAL1071917.8%24.7 mi48%
30ArizonaAZ3897018%11.8 mi1320.3%
31PennsylvaniaPA4658718.7%5.3 mi63.1%
32VirginiaVA2294318.8%12.6 mi00%
33IndianaIN3737219.3%12.1 mi00%
34South CarolinaSC931819.4%20.4 mi00%
35MississippiMS881820.5%21.5 mi00%
36VermontVT461021.7%0.8 mi15%
37WyomingWY461021.7%52 mi1655.2%
38MichiganMI3337422.2%4.7 mi75.9%
39MarylandMD3928822.4%1 mi00%
40UtahUT2245223.2%2.8 mi1118.6%
41New HampshireNH681623.5%4.4 mi00%
42Puerto RicoPR511223.5%7.3 mi00%
43GeorgiaGA2386125.6%5.9 mi00%
44New MexicoNM1072826.2%28 mi1329.5%
45NevadaNV742027%26.5 mi320%
46OhioOH46012928%3.8 mi00%
47TexasTX39911328.3%2.9 mi1510.7%
48West VirginiaWV1183428.8%8.9 mi00%
49FloridaFL47114330.4%0 mi00%
50LouisianaLA1604930.6%5.5 mi00%
51Rhode IslandRI391230.8%2.6 mi00%
52CaliforniaCA85631036.2%0 mi62.2%
Showing all 52 rows. Click any column to sort; state names link through to the full directory.Better accessWorse

Methodology ledger

SAMHSA national treatment locator · CDC VSRR provisional counts

Facilities analysed
11,513
Cities measured
4,041
Live CDC period
12mo to April 2026
METHOD_01

Source

Every substance use treatment facility in the national treatment locator export published by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), 11,513 facilities in total, retrieved August 16, 2026. A facility counts as reporting detox when its SAMHSA service codes include a detoxification service. We did not independently verify licensing status, and this analysis is not endorsed by or affiliated with SAMHSA.

METHOD_02

Distance

2,169 of the 2,261 listed detox facilities carry usable coordinates. For every city with at least one listed facility we measured the great-circle (straight-line) distance from its facility centroid to the nearest of those detox providers anywhere in the dataset; state and county lines are ignored, so the nearest provider may be in another state. No road distance or travel time was calculated. Thresholds and medians are computed on full-precision distances.

METHOD_03

Live overdose layer

Overdose figures are pulled directly from the CDC's provisional VSRR series (12 month-ending counts) and refresh as the federal release updates, currently 66,937 deaths for the 12 months ending April 2026. They are never edited by us.

LIMIT_01

Straight-line distance understates travel

Straight-line distance generally understates real-world travel distance and, where no direct drivable route exists — as with the island and roadless communities that dominate the Alaska figures — it can substantially understate the practical travel burden. Travel time was not modelled.

LIMIT_02

Providers, not beds

This analysis counts listed facilities that report detoxification as a service. It does not measure detox beds, bed availability, capacity, occupancy or admissions. A facility appearing here does not mean a detox bed is available, that a given insurer is accepted, or that anyone can be admitted today.

LIMIT_03

State systems differ

A state whose locator listing includes large numbers of small outpatient counselling offices will show a lower detox share without necessarily having fewer detox providers. Distance measures are more comparable across states than percentage share.

LIMIT_04

Facility self-reporting

Service codes are supplied by facilities to SAMHSA and are not independently audited by SAMHSA or by us. Every statement on this page describes what facilities report, not verified delivery of care.

LIMIT_05

CDC counts are provisional

Provisional overdose figures are revised as death certificates and toxicology finalise, and reporting lag differs by state. Treat month-to-month movement as direction, not a settled total.

METHOD_04

Two denominators

Two denominators appear on this page. City-level presence uses all 4,111 treatment cities: 2,810 of them contain no listed detox provider within the city itself. Distance measures use the 4,041 of those cities with sufficient geographic data to be measured; the remaining 70 had no usable facility coordinates and are excluded from every distance figure, including the 7.9-mile median and the >25 and >50 mile counts.

METHOD_05

Dates

Published September 2, 2026. SAMHSA facility export retrieved August 16, 2026. Analysis output generated 2026-09-02. Overdose figures are a live CDC provisional series and carry their own 12-month period, shown above. The SAMHSA facility file and the CDC series have different update cycles and are not a matched snapshot.

METHOD_06

Reproducibility

Both datasets below are the direct output of the analysis. Every figure on this page can be recomputed from them; the city file carries distances to three decimals so threshold counts reproduce exactly.

METHOD_07

Provider-to-death ratio

The providers-per-100-deaths ratio is computed only across the states and territories that appear in both datasets: 52 jurisdictions, 2,261 listed detox providers against 67,519 provisional overdose deaths, or 3.3 per 100. That denominator is the sum of state-level provisional counts and differs from the CDC's national figure of 66,937, which is modelled separately and adjusted for reporting lag. CDC publishes New York State excluding New York City, with New York City as its own row; because facility counts here are state-wide, the two rows are added together before the New York ratio is computed.

LIMIT_06

Levels of care are not distinguished

The SAMHSA service codes used here identify that a facility reports a detoxification service, not the level at which it is delivered. Reported services may include ambulatory as well as inpatient or medically managed withdrawal, so this page uses “detoxification services” rather than “medical detox” throughout.

Everything on this page is reproducible from the two files linked below.

Use this data

Both datasets are released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Journalists, researchers and public health agencies are free to republish, chart and build on them. Attribution to Treatment Locators with a link to this page is all we ask.

Cite this research

Treatment Locators. “The U.S. Detox Access Gap.” September 2, 2026. Analysis of substance use treatment facility data published by SAMHSA in its national treatment locator, retrieved August 16, 2026. Medically reviewed by Cole Timonere, PhD, JD, LMHC, LPCC. https://treatmentlocators.com/research/detox-access-gap

Released under CC BY 4.0. Attribute Treatment Locators and link to this page.

Questions about this analysis

What share of U.S. addiction treatment facilities report offering detoxification services?
19.6% — 2,261 of the 11,513 substance use treatment facilities listed in SAMHSA's national treatment locator report a detoxification service. The dataset does not distinguish between levels of withdrawal management, so this count may include ambulatory as well as inpatient detoxification. Service information is self-reported by facilities to SAMHSA.
How far is a typical treatment city from a listed detox provider?
This analysis measures treatment cities, not where individual Americans live. Across the 4,041 of 4,111 U.S. cities with at least one SAMHSA-listed treatment facility that could be geocoded, the median straight-line distance to the nearest facility reporting detoxification services is 7.9 miles. But 996 of those cities (24.6%) are more than 25 miles from one, and 341 (8.4%) are more than 50 miles away.
Which states have the lowest share of facilities reporting detoxification services?
Alaska (7.8%), Iowa (7.9%), Montana (8.2%), Hawaii (8.6%), Minnesota (8.8%).
Which U.S. city with treatment is farthest from a detox provider?
Unalaska, AK, at 792.7 straight-line miles from the nearest facility listed by SAMHSA as offering detoxification. The ten most isolated treatment cities in this dataset are all in Alaska.
Why does the availability of detoxification services matter?
Withdrawal from alcohol and from benzodiazepines can be medically dangerous, including seizures and, in the case of alcohol, delirium tremens; some patients require supervised withdrawal management. Long travel distances to the nearest listed provider may contribute to delayed treatment, greater reliance on emergency departments, or attempts to manage withdrawal without nearby specialty services.
Can I republish this data?
Yes. The state-level and city-level datasets are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Attribute Treatment Locators and link to the report page.

Related reference pages

This page is an independent analysis of publicly available treatment-facility data. The underlying facility records and a plain-language explanation of what detoxification services involve are published separately.